fix(tracing): Add association property #852
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds an associations feature to the Traceloop SDK for tracking customer/user/session IDs across spans and integrates it into a new interactive CLI chatbot sample that sets and uses session/user associations during conversations. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
actor User
participant App as InteractiveChatbot
participant Client as TraceloopClient
participant Span as CurrentSpan
participant Store as AssocStore
participant OpenAI as OpenAI API
User->>App: enter message (creates sessionId/userId)
App->>Client: client.associations.set([SESSION_ID, userId])
Client->>Client: setAssociationProperties(properties)
Client->>Span: attach TRACELOOP_ASSOCIATION_PROPERTIES
Client->>Store: setSpanAssociationPropertiesForInheritance(spanId, properties)
App->>OpenAI: stream response (gpt-4o) with conversation + tools
OpenAI-->>App: streamed tokens
App->>App: collect tokens, call tools (calculator/weather/time) as needed
Note over Span,Store: Child spans inherit properties
participant Child as ChildSpan
Child->>Store: getSpanAssociationProperties(parentSpanId)
Store-->>Child: parent properties
Child->>Child: merge and attach attributes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~22 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to 8e687cf in 1 minute and 41 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
845lines of code in8files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts:129
- Draft comment:
Using eval for math expressions can be risky even with sanitization. Consider using a dedicated math parser for improved security. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50% This comment is about a security concern with using eval(). While the code does sanitize the input, the comment is suggesting a code quality improvement - using a dedicated math parser library instead. However, I need to consider: 1) This is a sample app (packages/sample-app), not production code, 2) The comment is somewhat speculative about security risks ("can be risky"), 3) The rules say comments suggesting code quality refactors are good if actionable and clear. The comment is actionable (use a math parser library) but it's for a sample/demo app where eval() with sanitization might be acceptable for demonstration purposes. The comment doesn't point to a definite bug or issue, just a potential security improvement. This is a sample app meant for demonstration purposes, not production code. The eval() usage with sanitization might be intentionally simple for educational purposes. The comment is somewhat speculative ("can be risky") rather than pointing to a definite issue. It's also not clear if this level of security is necessary for a sample application. While it's a sample app, it could still set a bad example for developers who might copy this pattern. However, the rules emphasize only keeping comments with STRONG EVIDENCE of being correct and necessary. This is more of a best practice suggestion than a clear code issue, and for sample/demo code, the simpler eval approach might be intentionally chosen for clarity. This comment suggests a security improvement but is speculative ("can be risky") rather than pointing to a definite bug. Given this is sample/demo code and the rules require STRONG EVIDENCE that a comment is necessary, this falls into the category of a "nice to have" suggestion rather than a required change. The comment should be deleted.
2. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts:322
- Draft comment:
Randomly triggering cleanup with Math.random()<0.01 may not be robust in high-throughput scenarios. Consider a scheduled or more deterministic cleanup strategy. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
3. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/association.ts:38
- Draft comment:
The generic signature in withAssociationProperties seems overly complex. Consider simplifying the constraint to avoid potential recursive type issues. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
4. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/association.ts:2
- Draft comment:
Typo: The identifier 'ASSOCATION_PROPERTIES_KEY' seems to be misspelled. It likely should be 'ASSOCIATION_PROPERTIES_KEY'. Please verify and correct if necessary. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
5. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts:206
- Draft comment:
The constant name 'ASSOCATION_PROPERTIES_KEY' might be a typographical error. Consider checking if it should be 'ASSOCIATION_PROPERTIES_KEY'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_Iv22M3podC7M5HNs
You can customize 
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.ts (1)
34-43: Consider adding test coverage forclient.associations.set()API.The tests use
traceloop.setAssociationProperties(), but the newAssociationsclass exposes a different API viaclient.associations.set([[prop, value], ...]). Consider adding at least one test that exercises the tuple-based API to ensure both paths work correctly.packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/associations/associations.ts (1)
15-15: Consider allowing custom association properties.The
Associationtype restricts property names to theAssociationPropertyenum. While this provides type safety, users may need custom association properties beyond the predefined ones. Consider if the API should also accept arbitrary string keys for extensibility.🔎 Example extensible type
// Allow both enum values and custom strings export type Association = [AssociationProperty | string, string];
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Disabled knowledge base sources:
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
packages/sample-app/package.jsonpackages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/associations/associations.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/association.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
packages/*/package.json
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Use workspace:* for intra-repo package dependencies in package.json
Files:
packages/sample-app/package.json
packages/{instrumentation-*,traceloop-sdk}/**/*.{ts,tsx}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Import AI/LLM semantic attribute constants from @traceloop/ai-semantic-conventions rather than hardcoding strings
Files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/associations/associations.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/association.ts
packages/traceloop-sdk/**/*.{ts,tsx}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
packages/traceloop-sdk/**/*.{ts,tsx}: Use the provided decorators (@workflow, @task, @agent) for workflow/task/agent spans instead of re-implementing them
For manual LLM operations, use trace.withLLMSpan from @traceloop/node-server-sdk
Files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/associations/associations.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/association.ts
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.ts
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Register new instrumentation packages during SDK initialization
Files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.ts
🧠 Learnings (9)
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/{instrumentation-*,traceloop-sdk}/**/*.{ts,tsx} : Import AI/LLM semantic attribute constants from traceloop/ai-semantic-conventions rather than hardcoding strings
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/associations/associations.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/association.tspackages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/traceloop-sdk/**/*.{ts,tsx} : For manual LLM operations, use trace.withLLMSpan from traceloop/node-server-sdk
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/associations/associations.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/association.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.ts : Register new instrumentation packages during SDK initialization
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/instrumentation-*/**/*.{ts,tsx} : Instrumentations must create spans with appropriate AI/LLM semantic attributes for calls they wrap
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/association.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/instrumentation-*/**/*.{ts,tsx} : Do not implement anonymous telemetry collection in instrumentation packages; telemetry is collected only in the SDK
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/instrumentation-*/**/*.{ts,tsx} : Instrumentations must extract request/response data and token usage from wrapped calls
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/instrumentation-*/**/*.{ts,tsx} : Instrumentation classes must extend InstrumentationBase and register hooks using InstrumentationModuleDefinition
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/traceloop-sdk/**/*.{ts,tsx} : Use the provided decorators (workflow, task, agent) for workflow/task/agent spans instead of re-implementing them
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/association.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/ai-semantic-conventions/src/SemanticAttributes.ts : Define all AI/LLM span attribute constants in packages/ai-semantic-conventions/src/SemanticAttributes.ts
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/association.ts
🧬 Code graph analysis (5)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/associations/associations.ts (1)
Associations(20-46)
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.ts (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/test-setup.ts (2)
getSharedExporter(37-39)initializeSharedTraceloop(23-35)packages/ai-semantic-conventions/src/SemanticAttributes.ts (1)
SpanAttributes(17-58)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/tracing.ts (1)
ASSOCATION_PROPERTIES_KEY(7-9)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/association.ts (3)
getSpanAssociationProperties(13-17)setSpanAssociationPropertiesForInheritance(19-27)cleanupExpiredSpanAssociationProperties(29-36)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/association.ts (1)
packages/ai-semantic-conventions/src/SemanticAttributes.ts (1)
SpanAttributes(17-58)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/decorators.ts (1)
tool(287-293)
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts
[error] 129-129: eval() exposes to security risks and performance issues.
See the MDN web docs for more details.
Refactor the code so that it doesn't need to call eval().
(lint/security/noGlobalEval)
🪛 GitHub Actions: CI
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.ts
[warning] 1-1: Prettier formatting issue detected. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix formatting in this file.
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts
[warning] 1-1: Prettier formatting issue detected. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix formatting in this file.
packages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts
[warning] 1-1: Prettier formatting issue detected. Run 'pnpm prettier --write' to fix formatting in this file.
🔇 Additional comments (16)
packages/sample-app/package.json (1)
46-46: LGTM!The new script follows the established pattern for sample app scripts in this file.
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/node-server-sdk.ts (1)
70-71: LGTM!The new exports properly separate named exports from type exports and follow the existing patterns in this file.
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/client/traceloop-client.ts (1)
7-7: LGTM!The
Associationsintegration follows the established pattern for client members likeuserFeedback,datasets, andevaluator.Also applies to: 33-33, 53-53
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.ts (2)
1-279: Good test coverage for association propagation.The tests comprehensively cover single associations, multiple associations, all enum values, and mid-workflow updates. The assertions correctly verify that association properties propagate to both task and workflow spans.
22-22: No initialization order concern.
sharedMemoryExporteris created synchronously at module load time intest-setup.ts(line 24:export const sharedMemoryExporter = new InMemorySpanExporter()), not lazily during initialization. CallinggetSharedExporter()at line 22 is safe and returns an already-instantiated exporter. Thebefore()hook only initializes the SDK with this pre-existing exporter.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts (3)
24-28: LGTM!The new imports properly bring in the association utilities needed for span processing.
203-235: LGTM!The association property handling correctly:
- Retrieves context-level properties (from decorators)
- Retrieves inherited properties from the parent span
- Merges them with proper precedence (context overrides inherited)
- Stores merged properties for child span inheritance
- Sets span attributes using the semantic conventions constant
322-325: LGTM!The probabilistic cleanup (1% chance) for expired span association properties follows the same pattern as agent name cleanup, preventing memory leaks from the in-memory map.
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/associations/associations.ts (1)
1-46: LGTM!Clean implementation of the Associations API with:
- Well-documented
AssociationPropertyenum for type-safe property names- Tuple-based
Associationtype for structured input- Simple delegation to the underlying
setAssociationPropertiesfunctionThe JSDoc examples are helpful for users understanding the API.
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/association.ts (3)
1-3: LGTM!The imports correctly use
@traceloop/ai-semantic-conventionsforSpanAttributesas per coding guidelines.
5-36: LGTM!The in-memory store for span association properties is well-designed:
- Uses Map with span ID as key for O(1) lookups
- TTL-based cleanup prevents unbounded memory growth
- Clean separation of get/set/cleanup functions
63-96: Verify behavior when no active span exists.The function silently does nothing when there's no active span (line 72 check). This is reasonable for defensive programming, but users might expect an error or warning if they call
setAssociationPropertiesoutside of a span context. Consider whether a warning log would help users debug misconfigured tracing.packages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts (4)
9-12: LGTM!Clean initialization of the Traceloop client with appropriate configuration for a sample app.
43-77: LGTM!Good use of the
@traceloop.taskdecorator for the summary generation, following the coding guidelines for workflow/task spans.
79-93: LGTM!Good demonstration of the new associations API with proper fallback to the standalone function if the client is not available.
233-290: LGTM!Clean CLI implementation with proper handling of commands, graceful exit, and error handling.
| execute: async ({ expression }) => { | ||
| try { | ||
| // Simple safe eval for basic math (only allow numbers and operators) | ||
| const sanitized = expression.replace(/[^0-9+\-*/().\s]/g, ""); | ||
| const result = eval(sanitized); | ||
| console.log( | ||
| `\n${colors.yellow}🔧 Calculator: ${expression} = ${result}${colors.reset}`, | ||
| ); | ||
| return { result, expression }; | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| return { error: "Invalid mathematical expression" }; | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace eval() with a safer arithmetic parser.
The static analysis correctly flags eval() as a security risk. While the sanitization at line 128 removes most dangerous characters, eval() can still be exploited (e.g., via __proto__ manipulation in some contexts). For a sample app, consider using a simple arithmetic parser or a library like mathjs.
🔎 Suggested safer alternative
+// Simple arithmetic parser for basic operations
+function safeEvaluate(expression: string): number {
+ // Only allow numbers, operators, parentheses, and decimals
+ const sanitized = expression.replace(/[^0-9+\-*/().\s]/g, "");
+ if (!sanitized || sanitized !== expression.replace(/\s/g, "").replace(/[^0-9+\-*/().]/g, "")) {
+ throw new Error("Invalid expression");
+ }
+ // Use Function constructor as slightly safer alternative, or use mathjs
+ return new Function(`return ${sanitized}`)() as number;
+}
execute: async ({ expression }) => {
try {
- // Simple safe eval for basic math (only allow numbers and operators)
- const sanitized = expression.replace(/[^0-9+\-*/().\s]/g, "");
- const result = eval(sanitized);
+ const result = safeEvaluate(expression);
console.log(
`\n${colors.yellow}🔧 Calculator: ${expression} = ${result}${colors.reset}`,
);
return { result, expression };
} catch (error) {
return { error: "Invalid mathematical expression" };
}
},Alternatively, add mathjs as a dependency for robust expression parsing.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| execute: async ({ expression }) => { | |
| try { | |
| // Simple safe eval for basic math (only allow numbers and operators) | |
| const sanitized = expression.replace(/[^0-9+\-*/().\s]/g, ""); | |
| const result = eval(sanitized); | |
| console.log( | |
| `\n${colors.yellow}🔧 Calculator: ${expression} = ${result}${colors.reset}`, | |
| ); | |
| return { result, expression }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| return { error: "Invalid mathematical expression" }; | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| // Simple arithmetic parser for basic operations | |
| function safeEvaluate(expression: string): number { | |
| // Only allow numbers, operators, parentheses, and decimals | |
| const sanitized = expression.replace(/[^0-9+\-*/().\s]/g, ""); | |
| if (!sanitized || sanitized !== expression.replace(/\s/g, "").replace(/[^0-9+\-*/().]/g, "")) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid expression"); | |
| } | |
| // Use Function constructor as slightly safer alternative, or use mathjs | |
| return new Function(`return ${sanitized}`)() as number; | |
| } | |
| execute: async ({ expression }) => { | |
| try { | |
| const result = safeEvaluate(expression); | |
| console.log( | |
| `\n${colors.yellow}🔧 Calculator: ${expression} = ${result}${colors.reset}`, | |
| ); | |
| return { result, expression }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| return { error: "Invalid mathematical expression" }; | |
| } | |
| }, |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
[error] 129-129: eval() exposes to security risks and performance issues.
See the MDN web docs for more details.
Refactor the code so that it doesn't need to call eval().
(lint/security/noGlobalEval)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts around lines 125–137,
the current implementation uses eval() on a sanitized string which is a security
risk; replace eval with a safe arithmetic evaluator: add mathjs as a dependency
(or implement a small expression parser), import the evaluate function, call
evaluate(sanitized) instead of eval, catch and return parse/eval errors
unchanged, and retain or tighten the sanitization to only allow digits,
whitespace, basic operators and parentheses; ensure no global scope access or
function injection is possible and update error messages accordingly.
| execute: async ({ timezone }) => { | ||
| const now = new Date(); | ||
| const options: Intl.DateTimeFormatOptions = { | ||
| timeZone: timezone, | ||
| dateStyle: "full", | ||
| timeStyle: "long", | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle invalid timezone gracefully.
If an invalid timezone string is passed to toLocaleString, it will throw a RangeError. Consider wrapping in try-catch or validating the timezone.
🔎 Suggested fix
execute: async ({ timezone }) => {
const now = new Date();
- const options: Intl.DateTimeFormatOptions = {
- timeZone: timezone,
- dateStyle: "full",
- timeStyle: "long",
- };
- const formatted = now.toLocaleString("en-US", options);
+ let formatted: string;
+ try {
+ const options: Intl.DateTimeFormatOptions = {
+ timeZone: timezone,
+ dateStyle: "full",
+ timeStyle: "long",
+ };
+ formatted = now.toLocaleString("en-US", options);
+ } catch {
+ formatted = now.toLocaleString("en-US", {
+ dateStyle: "full",
+ timeStyle: "long",
+ });
+ }
console.log(
`\n${colors.yellow}🔧 Time: ${formatted}${colors.reset}`,
);🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts around lines 180 to
186, the call to toLocaleString with the provided timezone can throw a
RangeError for invalid timezone identifiers; wrap the formatting in a try-catch
(or validate the timezone beforehand) and fall back to a safe default (e.g., UTC
or server local time) while logging or returning a clear message about the
invalid timezone. Ensure the catch handles RangeError specifically and does not
swallow other exceptions, and update the returned/used value to the fallback
when an error occurs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed c417b43 in 35 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
342lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts:244
- Draft comment:
Formatting update: The console.log calls for Session and User IDs were simplified (removed extra newlines) to improve readability without any change in functionality. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts:207
- Draft comment:
Minor formatting improvements: The union type cast for association properties and the multi-line formatting for setSpanAssociationPropertiesForInheritance enhance readability without affecting functionality. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. packages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.ts:34
- Draft comment:
Test file formatting: The callbacks for setting association properties now use consistent multi-line formatting with trailing commas. This change improves readability without impacting test logic. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_GXa9qRn0Mtj0lT6R
You can customize
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts (2)
125-137: Replaceeval()with a safer arithmetic parser.The use of
eval()remains a security risk despite sanitization. This issue was previously identified and a safer alternative using a dedicated parser ormathjslibrary was recommended.
180-187: Handle invalid timezone gracefully.The call to
toLocaleStringwith an unvalidated timezone can throw aRangeError. This issue was previously identified with a recommendation to wrap in try-catch. Consider implementing the suggested error handling.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts (1)
82-93: Consider simplifying the association API usage.The code demonstrates both the new
client.associations.set()API and the fallbacksetAssociationProperties()function. Sinceclientis initialized synchronously at module level (line 9), it should always be available, making the else branch unreachable in practice.For a sample app, this dual demonstration is acceptable, but consider adding a comment explaining that the else branch is shown for completeness or removing it for clarity.
🔎 Optional simplification
async processMessage(userMessage: string): Promise<string> { // Set associations for tracing - if (client) { - client.associations.set([ - [traceloop.AssociationProperty.SESSION_ID, this.sessionId], - [traceloop.AssociationProperty.USER_ID, this.userId], - ]); - } else { - // Fallback to standalone function if no client - traceloop.setAssociationProperties({ - [traceloop.AssociationProperty.SESSION_ID]: this.sessionId, - [traceloop.AssociationProperty.USER_ID]: this.userId, - }); - } + client.associations.set([ + [traceloop.AssociationProperty.SESSION_ID, this.sessionId], + [traceloop.AssociationProperty.USER_ID, this.userId], + ]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Disabled knowledge base sources:
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
packages/{instrumentation-*,traceloop-sdk}/**/*.{ts,tsx}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Import AI/LLM semantic attribute constants from @traceloop/ai-semantic-conventions rather than hardcoding strings
Files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.ts
packages/traceloop-sdk/**/*.{ts,tsx}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
packages/traceloop-sdk/**/*.{ts,tsx}: Use the provided decorators (@workflow, @task, @agent) for workflow/task/agent spans instead of re-implementing them
For manual LLM operations, use trace.withLLMSpan from @traceloop/node-server-sdk
Files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.ts
🧠 Learnings (6)
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/traceloop-sdk/**/*.{ts,tsx} : Use the provided decorators (workflow, task, agent) for workflow/task/agent spans instead of re-implementing them
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.tspackages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/instrumentation-*/**/*.{ts,tsx} : Instrumentations must create spans with appropriate AI/LLM semantic attributes for calls they wrap
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/{instrumentation-*,traceloop-sdk}/**/*.{ts,tsx} : Import AI/LLM semantic attribute constants from traceloop/ai-semantic-conventions rather than hardcoding strings
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.tspackages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/traceloop-sdk/**/*.{ts,tsx} : For manual LLM operations, use trace.withLLMSpan from traceloop/node-server-sdk
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.tspackages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.tspackages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/ai-semantic-conventions/src/SemanticAttributes.ts : Define all AI/LLM span attribute constants in packages/ai-semantic-conventions/src/SemanticAttributes.ts
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: traceloop/openllmetry-js PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T22:08:07.023Z
Learning: Applies to packages/instrumentation-*/**/*.{ts,tsx} : Do not implement anonymous telemetry collection in instrumentation packages; telemetry is collected only in the SDK
Applied to files:
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/tracing.ts (1)
ASSOCATION_PROPERTIES_KEY(7-9)packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/association.ts (3)
getSpanAssociationProperties(13-17)setSpanAssociationPropertiesForInheritance(19-27)cleanupExpiredSpanAssociationProperties(29-36)
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.ts (2)
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/test-setup.ts (2)
getSharedExporter(37-39)initializeSharedTraceloop(23-35)packages/ai-semantic-conventions/src/SemanticAttributes.ts (1)
SpanAttributes(17-58)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts (1)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/decorators.ts (1)
tool(287-293)
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
packages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts
[error] 129-129: eval() exposes to security risks and performance issues.
See the MDN web docs for more details.
Refactor the code so that it doesn't need to call eval().
(lint/security/noGlobalEval)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/traceloop-sdk/src/lib/tracing/span-processor.ts (3)
24-28: LGTM! Clean import of association utilities.The imported functions integrate well with the existing span processing logic and follow the same patterns established for agent name handling.
203-240: LGTM! Solid association properties merging and propagation logic.The implementation correctly:
- Retrieves association properties from both context (decorator/API) and parent span (inheritance)
- Merges with proper precedence (context overrides inherited)
- Stores merged properties for child spans to inherit
- Sets span attributes with the correct prefix for telemetry
The merge semantics ensure that explicit calls to
setAssociationPropertiesor decorator-provided properties take precedence over inherited values, while still propagating parent associations down the trace tree.
327-330: LGTM! Cleanup properly prevents memory leaks.The probabilistic cleanup of expired association properties mirrors the existing agent name cleanup pattern and will prevent unbounded memory growth over time.
packages/traceloop-sdk/test/associations.test.ts (1)
24-291: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for associations feature.The test suite thoroughly validates:
- Single and multiple association properties
- Propagation to both task and workflow spans
- All
AssociationPropertyenum values- Mid-workflow updates and merge semantics
The test at lines 222-290 is particularly valuable as it confirms that association property updates correctly affect subsequent child spans while preserving the final merged state on the workflow span.
packages/sample-app/src/sample_chatbot_interactive.ts (3)
43-77: LGTM! Proper use of task decorator.The
generateSummarymethod correctly uses the@traceloop.taskdecorator to create a traced task span, complying with the coding guidelines for workflow/task spans.
139-170: LGTM! Clear simulation for demonstration purposes.The simulated weather tool is appropriate for a sample application, with console logging that makes it clear the data is not real.
233-286: LGTM! Well-structured interactive CLI with proper error handling.The readline-based interface properly handles user commands, errors, and graceful shutdown. The try-catch around
processMessageensures the CLI remains responsive even if individual interactions fail.
Important
Introduces an interactive chatbot application and enhances Traceloop SDK with association tracking for better trace management.
sample_chatbot_interactive.tsfor an interactive chatbot application with terminal interface, real-time streaming, and integrated tools for calculations and data retrieval.traceloop-sdkwithAssociationsclass andAssociationPropertyenum inassociations.ts.TraceloopClientintraceloop-client.tsnow includesassociationsfor managing trace associations.setAssociationPropertiesfunction inassociation.tsfor setting properties on spans and propagating to child spans.span-processor.tsupdated to handle association properties during span processing.associations.test.tsto test association setting and propagation across spans.This description was created by
for c417b43. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.