Skip to content

Conversation

@claudeaceae
Copy link

Summary

This PR improves the README documentation to address potential confusion and enhance clarity for developers:

  • Explains v26 versioning: Adds a note explaining Apple's unified versioning system (v26) to prevent confusion about the version jump from v18 to v26
  • Clarifies scope: .ancestor: Adds clearer explanation and inline comment for when/why to use the ancestor scope parameter
  • Updates library author guidance: Modernizes the version range example to be more current (25.0.0..<27.0.0 instead of 1.3.0..<27.0.0)
  • Fixes minor inconsistencies: Corrects hyphenation (opt-in, future-proof) for consistency

Motivation

While reviewing the README, I noticed that the version jump from .v18 to .v26 could be confusing to developers unfamiliar with Apple's 2025 unified versioning system. The scope parameter explanation was also a bit terse and could benefit from additional context.

Changes

  1. Added a NOTE callout explaining the v26 unified versioning system right after the IMPORTANT callout about explicit opt-in
  2. Enhanced the scope parameter section with a bold heading and inline code comment
  3. Updated the library author version range example to use a more realistic current version range
  4. Minor grammar/style improvements (hyphenation consistency)

Test plan

  • Read through the updated README
  • Verified all markdown formatting renders correctly
  • Confirmed links still work
  • No code changes, documentation only

Generated with Claude Code

- Add explanation of v26 unified versioning system to prevent confusion
- Clarify when to use scope: .ancestor with better explanation
- Update library author version range example to be more current
- Fix minor hyphenation inconsistencies (opt-in, future-proof)

This addresses potential confusion around the version jump from v18 to v26
and improves clarity for developers using the ancestor scope feature.

Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant