Skip to content

[build_push_container] Remove build_push_container role #3580

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
amartyasinha merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2026
Merged

[build_push_container] Remove build_push_container role #3580

amartyasinha merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2026
+0 −555

Conversation

@amartyasinha
Copy link
Contributor

@amartyasinha amartyasinha commented Jan 5, 2026

  • In previous commit [1], job to build cifmw-client container using this role was removed as no job uses containerized cifmw-client.
  • This commit continues the cleanup, and remove the build_push_container role.
  • This PR is a manual revert of original PR which added this role [2].

[1] #3563
[2] #2257

Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSPRH-23808

@amartyasinha
[build_push_container] Remove build_push_container role
6c4516b 
- In previous commit [1], job to build cifmw-client container using this role was removed as no job uses containerized cifmw-client.
- This commit continues the cleanup, and remove the build_push_container role.
- This PR is a manual revert of original PR which added this role [2].

[1] openstack-k8s-operators#3563
[2] openstack-k8s-operators#2257

Signed-off-by: Amartya Sinha <amsinha@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 5, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign rebtoor for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link

softwarefactory-project-zuul bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/4623041fe6c74e079c416eab520b4da6

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 52m 22s
✔️ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc SUCCESS in 1h 24m 18s
✔️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal SUCCESS in 1h 35m 13s
❌ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal-minor-update FAILURE in 26m 01s
✔️ cifmw-pod-zuul-files SUCCESS in 4m 31s
✔️ noop SUCCESS in 0s
✔️ cifmw-pod-ansible-test SUCCESS in 8m 46s
✔️ cifmw-pod-pre-commit SUCCESS in 7m 48s

@amartyasinha
Copy link
Contributor Author

amartyasinha commented Jan 5, 2026

recheck

@amartyasinha amartyasinha requested a review from a team January 6, 2026 07:12
brjackma
brjackma approved these changes Jan 6, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@brjackma brjackma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@amartyasinha amartyasinha requested a review from a team January 7, 2026 06:11
@amartyasinha amartyasinha enabled auto-merge (rebase) January 7, 2026 06:11
@amartyasinha amartyasinha requested a review from evallesp January 7, 2026 07:53
@amartyasinha amartyasinha merged commit ba7eef5 into openstack-k8s-operators:main Jan 7, 2026
7 checks passed
@amartyasinha amartyasinha deleted the remove-cifmw-client-role branch January 7, 2026 08:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@evallesp evallesp evallesp approved these changes

@brjackma brjackma brjackma approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Ready For Review

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@amartyasinha @evallesp @brjackma