Ignore Tag creation if the Snowflake Tag doesn't have value #25441

harshach · 2026-01-21T22:14:18Z

Describe your changes:

Fixes

Issue:

[2026-01-20 20:19:01] WARNING {metadata.Ingestion:status:109} - Error yielding tag []: [1 validation error for EntityName

String should have at least 1 character [type=string_too_short, input_value='', input_type=str]

Fix:
Snowflake tags should exist in key, value pair. It fetches value from set allowed values of a tag. Since one tag can have multiple values from allowed values and link to entity. ref. https://docs.snowflake.com/en/user-guide/object-tagging/introduction

2026-01-22 23:14:58] WARNING  {metadata.Ingestion:metadata:542} - Skipping tag 'TEST_TAG' for 'TEST_DB.PUBLIC.F_SR' - TAG_VALUE is empty. Snowflake tags require a value to be ingested.

Type of change:

Checklist:

I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
My PR title is Fixes <issue-number>: <short explanation>
I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
For JSON Schema changes: I updated the migration scripts or explained why it is not needed.

Summary by Gitar

Fixed Snowflake tag ingestion:
- Empty TAG_VALUE now skips gracefully with warnings in set_schema_tags_map() and yield_tag() methods
Sink-level validation:
- Added empty tag name check in MetadataRestSink.write_classification_and_tag() for defense in depth
Test coverage:
- test_empty_tag_value_skipped_with_warning validates Snowflake source-level filtering
- test_sink_empty_tag_validation.py with 5 test cases for sink-level validation edge cases

_{This will update automatically on new commits.}

github-actions · 2026-01-21T22:24:23Z

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `openmetadata-ingestion-base-slim:trivy (debian 12.13)`

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `Java`

Vulnerabilities (33)

Package	Vulnerability ID	Severity	Installed Version	Fixed Version
`com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core`	CVE-2025-52999	🚨 HIGH	2.12.7	2.15.0
`com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core`	CVE-2025-52999	🚨 HIGH	2.13.4	2.15.0
`com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind`	CVE-2022-42003	🚨 HIGH	2.12.7	2.12.7.1, 2.13.4.2
`com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind`	CVE-2022-42004	🚨 HIGH	2.12.7	2.12.7.1, 2.13.4
`com.google.code.gson:gson`	CVE-2022-25647	🚨 HIGH	2.2.4	2.8.9
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2021-22569	🚨 HIGH	3.3.0	3.16.1, 3.18.2, 3.19.2
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2022-3509	🚨 HIGH	3.3.0	3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2022-3510	🚨 HIGH	3.3.0	3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2024-7254	🚨 HIGH	3.3.0	3.25.5, 4.27.5, 4.28.2
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2021-22569	🚨 HIGH	3.7.1	3.16.1, 3.18.2, 3.19.2
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2022-3509	🚨 HIGH	3.7.1	3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2022-3510	🚨 HIGH	3.7.1	3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2024-7254	🚨 HIGH	3.7.1	3.25.5, 4.27.5, 4.28.2
`com.nimbusds:nimbus-jose-jwt`	CVE-2023-52428	🚨 HIGH	9.8.1	9.37.2
`com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp`	CVE-2021-0341	🚨 HIGH	3.12.12	4.9.2
`commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils`	CVE-2025-48734	🚨 HIGH	1.9.4	1.11.0
`commons-io:commons-io`	CVE-2024-47554	🚨 HIGH	2.8.0	2.14.0
`dnsjava:dnsjava`	CVE-2024-25638	🚨 HIGH	2.1.7	3.6.0
`io.netty:netty-codec-http2`	CVE-2025-55163	🚨 HIGH	4.1.96.Final	4.2.4.Final, 4.1.124.Final
`io.netty:netty-codec-http2`	GHSA-xpw8-rcwv-8f8p	🚨 HIGH	4.1.96.Final	4.1.100.Final
`io.netty:netty-handler`	CVE-2025-24970	🚨 HIGH	4.1.96.Final	4.1.118.Final
`net.minidev:json-smart`	CVE-2021-31684	🚨 HIGH	1.3.2	1.3.3, 2.4.4
`net.minidev:json-smart`	CVE-2023-1370	🚨 HIGH	1.3.2	2.4.9
`org.apache.avro:avro`	CVE-2024-47561	🔥 CRITICAL	1.7.7	1.11.4
`org.apache.avro:avro`	CVE-2023-39410	🚨 HIGH	1.7.7	1.11.3
`org.apache.derby:derby`	CVE-2022-46337	🔥 CRITICAL	10.14.2.0	10.14.3, 10.15.2.1, 10.16.1.2, 10.17.1.0
`org.apache.ivy:ivy`	CVE-2022-46751	🚨 HIGH	2.5.1	2.5.2
`org.apache.mesos:mesos`	CVE-2018-1330	🚨 HIGH	1.4.3	1.6.0
`org.apache.thrift:libthrift`	CVE-2019-0205	🚨 HIGH	0.12.0	0.13.0
`org.apache.thrift:libthrift`	CVE-2020-13949	🚨 HIGH	0.12.0	0.14.0
`org.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper`	CVE-2023-44981	🔥 CRITICAL	3.6.3	3.7.2, 3.8.3, 3.9.1
`org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server`	CVE-2024-13009	🚨 HIGH	9.4.56.v20240826	9.4.57.v20241219
`org.lz4:lz4-java`	CVE-2025-12183	🚨 HIGH	1.8.0	1.8.1

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `Node.js`

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `Python`

Vulnerabilities (9)

Package	Vulnerability ID	Severity	Installed Version	Fixed Version
`apache-airflow`	CVE-2025-68438	🚨 HIGH	3.1.5	3.1.6
`apache-airflow`	CVE-2025-68675	🚨 HIGH	3.1.5	3.1.6
`jaraco.context`	CVE-2026-23949	🚨 HIGH	5.3.0	6.1.0
`starlette`	CVE-2025-62727	🚨 HIGH	0.48.0	0.49.1
`urllib3`	CVE-2025-66418	🚨 HIGH	1.26.20	2.6.0
`urllib3`	CVE-2025-66471	🚨 HIGH	1.26.20	2.6.0
`urllib3`	CVE-2026-21441	🚨 HIGH	1.26.20	2.6.3
`wheel`	CVE-2026-24049	🚨 HIGH	0.45.1	0.46.2
`wheel`	CVE-2026-24049	🚨 HIGH	0.45.1	0.46.2

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `/etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key`

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/extended_sample_data.yaml`

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/lineage.yaml`

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/sample_data.json`

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/sample_data.yaml`

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/sample_data_aut.yaml`

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage.json`

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage.yaml`

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage_aut.yaml`

No Vulnerabilities Found

github-actions · 2026-01-21T22:25:37Z

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `openmetadata-ingestion:trivy (debian 12.12)`

Vulnerabilities (4)

Package	Vulnerability ID	Severity	Installed Version	Fixed Version
`libpam-modules`	CVE-2025-6020	🚨 HIGH	1.5.2-6+deb12u1	1.5.2-6+deb12u2
`libpam-modules-bin`	CVE-2025-6020	🚨 HIGH	1.5.2-6+deb12u1	1.5.2-6+deb12u2
`libpam-runtime`	CVE-2025-6020	🚨 HIGH	1.5.2-6+deb12u1	1.5.2-6+deb12u2
`libpam0g`	CVE-2025-6020	🚨 HIGH	1.5.2-6+deb12u1	1.5.2-6+deb12u2

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `Java`

Vulnerabilities (33)

Package	Vulnerability ID	Severity	Installed Version	Fixed Version
`com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core`	CVE-2025-52999	🚨 HIGH	2.12.7	2.15.0
`com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core`	CVE-2025-52999	🚨 HIGH	2.13.4	2.15.0
`com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind`	CVE-2022-42003	🚨 HIGH	2.12.7	2.12.7.1, 2.13.4.2
`com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind`	CVE-2022-42004	🚨 HIGH	2.12.7	2.12.7.1, 2.13.4
`com.google.code.gson:gson`	CVE-2022-25647	🚨 HIGH	2.2.4	2.8.9
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2021-22569	🚨 HIGH	3.3.0	3.16.1, 3.18.2, 3.19.2
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2022-3509	🚨 HIGH	3.3.0	3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2022-3510	🚨 HIGH	3.3.0	3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2024-7254	🚨 HIGH	3.3.0	3.25.5, 4.27.5, 4.28.2
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2021-22569	🚨 HIGH	3.7.1	3.16.1, 3.18.2, 3.19.2
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2022-3509	🚨 HIGH	3.7.1	3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2022-3510	🚨 HIGH	3.7.1	3.16.3, 3.19.6, 3.20.3, 3.21.7
`com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java`	CVE-2024-7254	🚨 HIGH	3.7.1	3.25.5, 4.27.5, 4.28.2
`com.nimbusds:nimbus-jose-jwt`	CVE-2023-52428	🚨 HIGH	9.8.1	9.37.2
`com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp`	CVE-2021-0341	🚨 HIGH	3.12.12	4.9.2
`commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils`	CVE-2025-48734	🚨 HIGH	1.9.4	1.11.0
`commons-io:commons-io`	CVE-2024-47554	🚨 HIGH	2.8.0	2.14.0
`dnsjava:dnsjava`	CVE-2024-25638	🚨 HIGH	2.1.7	3.6.0
`io.netty:netty-codec-http2`	CVE-2025-55163	🚨 HIGH	4.1.96.Final	4.2.4.Final, 4.1.124.Final
`io.netty:netty-codec-http2`	GHSA-xpw8-rcwv-8f8p	🚨 HIGH	4.1.96.Final	4.1.100.Final
`io.netty:netty-handler`	CVE-2025-24970	🚨 HIGH	4.1.96.Final	4.1.118.Final
`net.minidev:json-smart`	CVE-2021-31684	🚨 HIGH	1.3.2	1.3.3, 2.4.4
`net.minidev:json-smart`	CVE-2023-1370	🚨 HIGH	1.3.2	2.4.9
`org.apache.avro:avro`	CVE-2024-47561	🔥 CRITICAL	1.7.7	1.11.4
`org.apache.avro:avro`	CVE-2023-39410	🚨 HIGH	1.7.7	1.11.3
`org.apache.derby:derby`	CVE-2022-46337	🔥 CRITICAL	10.14.2.0	10.14.3, 10.15.2.1, 10.16.1.2, 10.17.1.0
`org.apache.ivy:ivy`	CVE-2022-46751	🚨 HIGH	2.5.1	2.5.2
`org.apache.mesos:mesos`	CVE-2018-1330	🚨 HIGH	1.4.3	1.6.0
`org.apache.thrift:libthrift`	CVE-2019-0205	🚨 HIGH	0.12.0	0.13.0
`org.apache.thrift:libthrift`	CVE-2020-13949	🚨 HIGH	0.12.0	0.14.0
`org.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper`	CVE-2023-44981	🔥 CRITICAL	3.6.3	3.7.2, 3.8.3, 3.9.1
`org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server`	CVE-2024-13009	🚨 HIGH	9.4.56.v20240826	9.4.57.v20241219
`org.lz4:lz4-java`	CVE-2025-12183	🚨 HIGH	1.8.0	1.8.1

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `Node.js`

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `Python`

Vulnerabilities (17)

Package	Vulnerability ID	Severity	Installed Version	Fixed Version
`Werkzeug`	CVE-2024-34069	🚨 HIGH	2.2.3	3.0.3
`aiohttp`	CVE-2025-69223	🚨 HIGH	3.12.12	3.13.3
`aiohttp`	CVE-2025-69223	🚨 HIGH	3.13.2	3.13.3
`apache-airflow`	CVE-2025-68438	🚨 HIGH	3.1.5	3.1.6
`apache-airflow`	CVE-2025-68675	🚨 HIGH	3.1.5	3.1.6
`azure-core`	CVE-2026-21226	🚨 HIGH	1.37.0	1.38.0
`jaraco.context`	CVE-2026-23949	🚨 HIGH	5.3.0	6.1.0
`jaraco.context`	CVE-2026-23949	🚨 HIGH	5.3.0	6.1.0
`pyasn1`	CVE-2026-23490	🚨 HIGH	0.6.1	0.6.2
`ray`	CVE-2025-62593	🔥 CRITICAL	2.47.1	2.52.0
`starlette`	CVE-2025-62727	🚨 HIGH	0.48.0	0.49.1
`urllib3`	CVE-2025-66418	🚨 HIGH	1.26.20	2.6.0
`urllib3`	CVE-2025-66471	🚨 HIGH	1.26.20	2.6.0
`urllib3`	CVE-2026-21441	🚨 HIGH	1.26.20	2.6.3
`wheel`	CVE-2026-24049	🚨 HIGH	0.45.1	0.46.2
`wheel`	CVE-2026-24049	🚨 HIGH	0.45.1	0.46.2
`wheel`	CVE-2026-24049	🚨 HIGH	0.45.1	0.46.2

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `/etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key`

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: `/home/airflow/openmetadata-airflow-apis/openmetadata_managed_apis.egg-info/PKG-INFO`

No Vulnerabilities Found

github-actions · 2026-01-22T04:55:25Z

The Python checkstyle failed.

Please run make py_format and py_format_check in the root of your repository and commit the changes to this PR.
You can also use pre-commit to automate the Python code formatting.

You can install the pre-commit hooks with make install_test precommit_install.

gitar-bot · 2026-01-22T20:43:22Z

🔍 CI failure analysis for 6a9b42e: CI failures across backend Python tests and frontend Playwright tests are unrelated to this PR's backend-only Snowflake tag validation changes.

Issue

Multiple CI failures occurred across different test suites:

Python Integration Test Failures: 2 types of test failures in backend Python tests
Frontend Playwright Test Failures: 17 total failed tests across 3 playwright-ci-postgresql jobs after retries

Root Cause

Backend Test Failures (UNRELATED to PR changes)

Test Failure #1: NHS Number Detection

Test test_it_returns_the_expected_classifications failed in ingestion/tests/integration/auto_classification/test_tag_processor.py:150
Multiple Python 3.10 and 3.11 jobs affected
Evidence this is unrelated: PR only adds empty tag validation for Snowflake; NHS number recognizer failure is for PostgreSQL PII detection auto-classification, completely separate functionality
The test file WAS modified in this PR (lines 183-189) but only to fix a type conversion and update expected tags for timestamp_column, NOT for the failing nhs_number_column assertion

Test Errors #2: Trino Classifier Tests

7 tests in ingestion/tests/integration/trino/test_classifier.py errored during fixture setup
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'name' in Sampler step
Evidence this is unrelated: PR only touches Snowflake tag handling, not Trino connector or auto-classification workflow infrastructure

Frontend Playwright Test Failures (UNRELATED to PR changes)

The latest Playwright job (61214229748) shows 4 persistent failures in the playwright-ci-postgresql (3/6) shard:

MutuallyExclusiveColumnTags test: page.click: Test timeout of 60000ms exceeded
Table/search consistency tests: Target page, context or browser has been closed
SchemaTable test: expect(locator).toContainText failed
Permissions tests: Element visibility/enabled failures
SettingsNavigation test: Drag and drop UI timing issues
ExploreDiscovery test: Element attachment failures
Metric test: page.waitForResponse: Target page, context or browser has been closed
ServiceForm test: File system errors (ENOENT)

Common patterns:

Browser crashes/closures ("Target page, context or browser has been closed")
Timeout errors on UI interactions
Element visibility/attachment failures
Test infrastructure issues

Evidence frontend failures are unrelated:

PR Scope: This PR modifies Python backend ingestion code only:
- ingestion/src/metadata/ingestion/sink/metadata_rest.py
- ingestion/src/metadata/ingestion/source/database/snowflake/metadata.py
- Backend Python test files
No Frontend Changes: PR contains ZERO changes to:
- Frontend TypeScript/React code
- UI components for glossary, tags, permissions, tables, lineage, services, etc.
- Playwright test files themselves
- Any frontend routing, state management, or API response handling
Failure Patterns: The Playwright failures show characteristic flaky E2E test behavior across diverse features unrelated to backend tag validation logic

Details

Backend Test Failures: Pre-existing or environment-related issues in PostgreSQL PII detection and Trino classifier tests, both unrelated to Snowflake tag validation changes.

Frontend Playwright Test Failures: 17 failed tests across 3 jobs showing UI flakiness, browser stability issues, timing problems, and test cleanup failures. The playwright-ci-postgresql (3/6) shard consistently shows the same 4 persistent failures across multiple runs.

Conclusion: All CI failures are unrelated to this PR's backend-only Snowflake tag validation changes. The failures represent flaky E2E tests and pre-existing test infrastructure issues.

Code Review ✅ Approved 2 resolved / 2 findings

Clean bug fix that properly handles Snowflake tags with empty values, with appropriate defense-in-depth validation at the sink layer and comprehensive test coverage.

More details ✅ 2 resolved

✅ Quality: Duplicated fqn_elements computation in yield_tag

📄 ingestion/src/metadata/ingestion/source/database/snowflake/metadata.py:534
The fqn_elements = [name for name in row[2:] if name] computation is duplicated:

Line 534 (inside the early-return block for logging)

Line 540 (after the continue, for actual processing)

This duplication is minor but could lead to inconsistencies if the logic needs to change. Consider computing fqn_elements once before the check:
for res in result:
    row = list(res)
    fqn_elements = [name for name in row[2:] if name]
    # row[0] = TAG_NAME, row[1] = TAG_VALUE
    if not row[1]:
        logger.warning(
            f"Skipping tag '{row[0]}' for '{'.'.join(fqn_elements)}' - "
            "TAG_VALUE is empty. Snowflake tags require a value to be ingested."
        )
        continue
    yield from get_ometa_tag_and_classification(
        ...
    )
This eliminates the duplication while preserving the same behavior.

✅ Edge Case: Validation checks tag_name, but the source issue is empty TAG_VALUE

📄 ingestion/src/metadata/ingestion/sink/metadata_rest.py:437
The sink validation checks for empty tag names (if not tag_name or not tag_name.strip()), but the Snowflake source already filters out empty TAG_VALUE before creating tag records. The tag name in Snowflake is TAG_NAME which is always populated - it's the TAG_VALUE that can be empty.

This sink-level validation provides a safety net but may never trigger in practice for the Snowflake case since the source already skips records with empty TAG_VALUE. The warning message says "Skipping tag with empty name" which could be misleading since the actual issue in Snowflake is empty tag values, not empty tag names.

Consider whether this validation is needed given the source-level filtering, or if the message should be more generic to cover different scenarios.

What Works Well

Consistent validation pattern applied at both source (Snowflake) and sink layers. Clear, informative warning messages that help users understand why tags are skipped. Comprehensive test coverage including edge cases like empty strings, None values, and whitespace-only names.

Rules ✅ All requirements met

Gitar Rules

✅ Summary Enhancement: Comprehensive summary exists, accurately describes all changes

_{2 rules not applicable. Show all rules by commenting gitar display:verbose.}

Tip

Comment Gitar fix CI or enable auto-apply: gitar auto-apply:on

Options

Auto-apply is off → Gitar will not commit updates to this branch.
Display: compact → Showing less information.

Comment with these commands to change:

`Auto-apply`	`Compact`
`gitar auto-apply:on`	`gitar display:verbose`

_{Was this helpful? React with 👍 / 👎 | Gitar}

* Ignore Tag creation if the Snowflake Tag doesn't have value * fix metadata_rest * add unit test * py_format * Address gitar comments * fix tests --------- Co-authored-by: ulixius9 <mayursingal9@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Mohit Tilala <tilalamohit123@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Mohit Tilala <63147650+mohittilala@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: harshsoni2024 <harshsoni2024@gmail.com>

mohittilala · 2026-01-23T00:05:59Z

Manually cherry-picked to 1.11.6 and 1.11.7 branch.

Ignore Tag creation if the Snowflake Tag doesn't have value

14ce3ee

harshach requested a review from a team as a code owner January 21, 2026 22:14

harshach had a problem deploying to test January 21, 2026 22:14 — with GitHub Actions Failure

github-actions bot added backend safe to test Add this label to run secure Github workflows on PRs labels Jan 21, 2026

ulixius9 added 2 commits January 22, 2026 10:12

fix metadata_rest

2c491ce

add unit test

fa65927

ulixius9 had a problem deploying to test January 22, 2026 04:47 — with GitHub Actions Failure

py_format

12f1fb2

mohittilala had a problem deploying to test January 22, 2026 15:37 — with GitHub Actions Error

Merge branch 'main' into snowflake_tags

7a62b44

mohittilala had a problem deploying to test January 22, 2026 15:37 — with GitHub Actions Error

mohittilala had a problem deploying to test January 22, 2026 20:34 — with GitHub Actions Error

mohittilala removed the backend label Jan 22, 2026

Merge branch 'main' into snowflake_tags

6a9b42e

github-actions bot added the backend label Jan 22, 2026

mohittilala had a problem deploying to test January 22, 2026 20:35 — with GitHub Actions Failure

mohittilala temporarily deployed to test January 22, 2026 20:35 — with GitHub Actions Inactive

mohittilala had a problem deploying to test January 22, 2026 20:35 — with GitHub Actions Failure

mohittilala had a problem deploying to test January 22, 2026 22:09 — with GitHub Actions Failure

mohittilala temporarily deployed to test January 22, 2026 22:09 — with GitHub Actions Inactive

mohittilala had a problem deploying to test January 22, 2026 22:09 — with GitHub Actions Failure

mohittilala had a problem deploying to test January 22, 2026 23:36 — with GitHub Actions Error

harshach merged commit 5e15a78 into main Jan 22, 2026
25 of 35 checks passed

harshach deleted the snowflake_tags branch January 22, 2026 23:48

github-project-automation bot moved this to Done ✅ in Jan - 2026 Jan 22, 2026

mohittilala added the To release Will cherry-pick this PR into the release branch label Jan 22, 2026

mohittilala temporarily deployed to test January 22, 2026 23:49 — with GitHub Actions Inactive

mohittilala had a problem deploying to test January 22, 2026 23:49 — with GitHub Actions Failure

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Ignore Tag creation if the Snowflake Tag doesn't have value #25441

Ignore Tag creation if the Snowflake Tag doesn't have value #25441

harshach commented Jan 21, 2026 •

edited by gitar-bot bot

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2026

Uh oh!

gitar-bot bot commented Jan 22, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Issue

Root Cause

Backend Test Failures (UNRELATED to PR changes)

Frontend Playwright Test Failures (UNRELATED to PR changes)

Details

What Works Well

Gitar Rules

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

mohittilala commented Jan 23, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

Ignore Tag creation if the Snowflake Tag doesn't have value #25441

Ignore Tag creation if the Snowflake Tag doesn't have value #25441

Conversation

harshach commented Jan 21, 2026 • edited by gitar-bot bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Describe your changes:

Type of change:

Checklist:

Summary by Gitar

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: openmetadata-ingestion-base-slim:trivy (debian 12.13)

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: Java

Vulnerabilities (33)

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: Node.js

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: Python

Vulnerabilities (9)

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: /ingestion/pipelines/extended_sample_data.yaml

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: /ingestion/pipelines/lineage.yaml

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_data.json

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_data.yaml

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_data_aut.yaml

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage.json

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage.yaml

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: /ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage_aut.yaml

No Vulnerabilities Found

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: openmetadata-ingestion:trivy (debian 12.12)

Vulnerabilities (4)

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: Java

Vulnerabilities (33)

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: Node.js

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: Python

Vulnerabilities (17)

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: /etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key

No Vulnerabilities Found

🛡️ TRIVY SCAN RESULT 🛡️

Target: /home/airflow/openmetadata-airflow-apis/openmetadata_managed_apis.egg-info/PKG-INFO

No Vulnerabilities Found

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2026

Uh oh!

gitar-bot bot commented Jan 22, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Issue

Root Cause

Backend Test Failures (UNRELATED to PR changes)

harshach commented Jan 21, 2026 •

edited by gitar-bot bot

Loading

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Target: `openmetadata-ingestion-base-slim:trivy (debian 12.13)`

Target: `Java`

Target: `Node.js`

Target: `Python`

Target: `/etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key`

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/extended_sample_data.yaml`

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/lineage.yaml`

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/sample_data.json`

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/sample_data.yaml`

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/sample_data_aut.yaml`

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage.json`

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage.yaml`

Target: `/ingestion/pipelines/sample_usage_aut.yaml`

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Target: `openmetadata-ingestion:trivy (debian 12.12)`

Target: `Java`

Target: `Node.js`

Target: `Python`

Target: `/etc/ssl/private/ssl-cert-snakeoil.key`

Target: `/home/airflow/openmetadata-airflow-apis/openmetadata_managed_apis.egg-info/PKG-INFO`

gitar-bot bot commented Jan 22, 2026 •

edited

Loading