-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
[bugfix][NPU]:Fix bug that correctly obtains device type #1229
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @Feng0w0, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request resolves a bug where the device type was incorrectly identified, specifically for NPU (Neural Processing Unit) devices. The fix ensures that the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request fixes a bug in how the device type is checked for NPU devices. The change from some_tensor.device == "npu" to some_tensor.device.type == "npu" is correct, as it properly compares the device type string.
I've added a couple of comments regarding a potential inefficiency in the mixed-precision logic for NPU devices. While the bugfix is correct, the casting to complex64 might be ineffective due to PyTorch's type promotion rules, as other tensors in the operation remain complex128. This is something you might want to look into for optimal performance and correctness on NPUs.
Overall, the change is a good and necessary bugfix.
| x_out = torch.view_as_complex(x.to(torch.float64).reshape( | ||
| x.shape[0], x.shape[1], x.shape[2], -1, 2)) | ||
| freqs = freqs.to(torch.complex64) if freqs.device == "npu" else freqs | ||
| freqs = freqs.to(torch.complex64) if freqs.device.type == "npu" else freqs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While this change correctly fixes the device type check, there might be an underlying issue with the mixed-precision logic on NPU devices.
On line 94, x_out is created as a complex128 tensor (from torch.float64). With this change, freqs is converted to complex64 on NPU devices.
When x_out * freqs is executed on line 97, PyTorch's type promotion will likely cast freqs back to complex128 to match x_out's dtype. This could render the conversion to complex64 ineffective. If complex128 operations are unsupported on NPU, this could still lead to errors.
For this to work as intended (using complex64 on NPU), x_out should probably also be created as complex64. This would involve changing x.to(torch.float64) on line 94 to use torch.float32 when on an NPU device.
| freqs = pad_freqs(freqs, s_per_rank * sp_size) | ||
| freqs_rank = freqs[(sp_rank * s_per_rank):((sp_rank + 1) * s_per_rank), :, :] | ||
| freqs_rank = freqs_rank.to(torch.complex64) if freqs_rank.device == "npu" else freqs_rank | ||
| freqs_rank = freqs_rank.to(torch.complex64) if freqs_rank.device.type == "npu" else freqs_rank |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Similar to the other file, while this change is correct, there's a potential mixed-precision issue on NPU devices.
x_out is created as complex128 on line 46. Here, freqs_rank is cast to complex64 for NPU devices.
During the multiplication x_out * freqs_rank on line 54, freqs_rank will likely be promoted back to complex128. This makes the cast to complex64 ineffective and might not resolve underlying performance or compatibility issues on NPU if complex128 is the problem.
To fully leverage complex64 on NPU, x_out should also be created as complex64 by changing x.to(torch.float64) on line 46 to use torch.float32 for NPU devices.
Fix:
freqs.device->freqs.device.type