-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
execute-type param addition in GkeCodeExecutor #4111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
SHRUTI6991
wants to merge
10
commits into
google:main
Choose a base branch
from
SHRUTI6991:execute-type/param-addition
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+205
−9
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0b28736
Add initial implementation to take in executor_type in gke_code_execu…
SHRUTI6991 cf9a092
Fix extension name.
SHRUTI6991 d5351f3
Address gemini comments to fix the dependency.
SHRUTI6991 ac876c5
Address comments to add logging and validation.
SHRUTI6991 9d1fd94
Address comments to reflect changes the class comment block.
SHRUTI6991 d9247be
Correct format for the failed format checks.
SHRUTI6991 8c9dbd3
Merge branch 'main' into execute-type/param-addition
SHRUTI6991 f183e80
Correct comment block.
SHRUTI6991 72dbf2d
Merge branch 'main' into execute-type/param-addition
SHRUTI6991 8a2a844
Add stderr to raise errors from sandbox failures.
SHRUTI6991 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using a direct Git URL with a specific commit hash for a dependency can make dependency management and updates challenging. It ties the project to an immutable state of the external repository, which might not receive updates or security patches easily. Consider if there's a way to depend on a published package with version ranges, or if this is a temporary measure, document the long-term plan for this dependency.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a plan to transition this to a versioned release instead of a direct Git dependency to a specific commit?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we are going to publish the python client to PyPI. This is an interim solution.