chore: add changelog and guide #107
Conversation
|
Claude finished @tac0turtle's task —— View job PR Review: Changelog and Guide AdditionReviewing this PR for code quality, best practices, potential issues, performance, security, and test coverage. Todo List:
Review Findings🟢 Overall AssessmentThis PR adds valuable documentation and EIP-1559 configuration capabilities. The code quality is high with good error handling and comprehensive test coverage. 📁 CHANGELOG.md✅ Strengths:
📁 crates/node/src/chainspec.rs✅ Strengths:
🔍 Code Quality Details:
✅ No Security Concerns Identified 📁 docs/UPGRADE-v0.2.2.md✅ Strengths:
🔒 Security Analysis✅ No security issues identified:
🧪 Test Coverage✅ Excellent test coverage in chainspec.rs:
📝 Missing test areas:
🚀 Performance Considerations✅ No performance concerns:
📋 Recommendations
✅ Recommendation: APPROVE This PR successfully adds valuable features with proper documentation, excellent code quality, comprehensive testing, and good security practices. The additions are well-architected and maintain backward compatibility while providing new capabilities for ev-reth deployments. |
Summary of ChangesHello @tac0turtle, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a new upgrade guide and updates the changelog to reflect recent features added to ev-reth, including permissioned EVM support, EIP-1559 configuration, and the AdminProxy contract. It also includes a new test case to ensure default EIP-1559 parameters are preserved when no overrides are specified. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new upgrade guide for v0.2.2, updates the changelog to reflect new features, and adds a test case for EIP-1559 overrides. The new documentation is comprehensive and well-structured. My feedback primarily focuses on ensuring consistency in placeholders and examples within the new upgrade guide to enhance clarity for users.
| "0xAnotherDeployerAddressHere" | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The placeholder 0xYourDeployerAddressHere is used here, but later in the document, 0xYourDeployerAddress is used (e.g., line 130, 160). For consistency, please use a single placeholder format throughout the document.
| "0xAnotherDeployerAddressHere" | |
| ], | |
| "deployAllowlist": [ | |
| "0xYourDeployerAddress", | |
| "0xAnotherDeployerAddress" | |
| ], |
| "code": "0x<ADMIN_PROXY_BYTECODE>", | ||
| "storage": { | ||
| "0x0": "0x000000000000000000000000<OWNER_ADDRESS_WITHOUT_0x>" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The placeholder 0x<OWNER_ADDRESS_WITHOUT_0x> is used here, implying the 0x prefix should be omitted. However, in the "Complete Chainspec Example" (line 145) and "Example with concrete addresses" (line 192), 0x<OWNER_ADDRESS> and 0xf39Fd6e51aad88F6F4ce6aB8827279cffFb92266 (which includes 0x) are used. Please ensure consistency in how owner addresses are represented in examples, especially regarding the 0x prefix.
| } | |
| "0x0": "0x000000000000000000000000<OWNER_ADDRESS>" |
| "contractSizeLimit": 131072, | ||
| "contractSizeLimitActivationHeight": 0, | ||
| "deployAllowlist": [ | ||
| "0xYourDeployerAddress" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The placeholder 0xYourDeployerAddress is used here, which is inconsistent with 0xYourDeployerAddressHere used earlier (line 24). Please standardize on one format.
| "0xYourDeployerAddress" | |
| "deployAllowlist": [ | |
| "0xYourDeployerAddressHere" | |
| ], |
| "balance": "0x0", | ||
| "code": "0x<ADMIN_PROXY_BYTECODE>", | ||
| "storage": { | ||
| "0x0": "0x000000000000000000000000<OWNER_ADDRESS>" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The placeholder 0x<OWNER_ADDRESS> is used here, which is inconsistent with 0x<OWNER_ADDRESS_WITHOUT_0x> used earlier (line 83). Please standardize on one format and clarify if the 0x prefix should be included or not. Given the example on line 192, it seems the 0x prefix is expected.
| "0x0": "0x000000000000000000000000<OWNER_ADDRESS>" | |
| "0x0": "0x000000000000000000000000<OWNER_ADDRESS_WITHOUT_0x>" |
| "evolve": { | ||
| "deployAllowlist": [ | ||
| "0xYourDeployerAddress" | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The placeholder 0xYourDeployerAddress is used here, which is inconsistent with 0xYourDeployerAddressHere used earlier (line 24). Please standardize on one format.
| ], | |
| "deployAllowlist": [ | |
| "0xYourDeployerAddressHere" | |
| ], |
Description
Type of Change
Related Issues
Fixes #(issue)
Checklist
Testing
Additional Notes