[RC2] Rename "relationship" to "structural property" #36683
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SamMonoRT
changed the title
SamMonoRT
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2025
artl93
approved these changes
Aug 29, 2025
Member
artl93
left a comment
artl93
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rc2 . Technically a breaking change.
Member
Author
|
@artl93 just noting that the public API changes here have already been changed earlier in 10, this just changes them again (so it's not an rc.2 breaking change). These are all also provider-facing (as opposed to user-facing) APIs. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As part of the recent complex type work, the term "relationship" has been introduced to refer to both navigations and complex properties; as per our design discussions, we'll rename these to "structural property" instead (as relationships are more tightly related to relational databases and foreign-key based relationships, etc.).
These are very light, mechanical renames - am submitting this in tell mode.
/cc @artl93