-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
code reviewer example #5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve altering routes, introducing an image cropper component consisting of HTML, CSS, and TypeScript files, and modifying the main application template by commenting out certain user action buttons. Additionally, an Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| /** | ||
| * Adds app component - bad code function for ai code reviewer analysis | ||
| * @param a | ||
| * @param b | ||
| * @returns | ||
| */ | ||
| add(a: any, b: any) { | ||
| return a + b; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The add method uses the any type for its parameters, which compromises type safety. TypeScript's type system is designed to prevent such issues by enforcing type checks at compile time. Using any bypasses these checks, potentially leading to runtime errors or unexpected behavior. Consider specifying explicit types for the parameters to ensure type safety and clarity in the method's purpose. Additionally, the usage of this method in the constructor with mixed types (this.add(3, '5')) could lead to incorrect results due to JavaScript's type coercion. It's advisable to ensure consistent parameter types to avoid such issues.
- add(a: any, b: any) {
+ add(a: number, b: number) {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| /** | |
| * Adds app component - bad code function for ai code reviewer analysis | |
| * @param a | |
| * @param b | |
| * @returns | |
| */ | |
| add(a: any, b: any) { | |
| return a + b; | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Adds app component - bad code function for ai code reviewer analysis | |
| * @param a | |
| * @param b | |
| * @returns | |
| */ | |
| add(a: number, b: number) { | |
| return a + b; | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think my code is correct
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Rubanrubi: I understand your perspective and the context of this pull request, which aims to explore the capabilities of AI-based code review. The feedback provided is based on TypeScript's best practices, emphasizing type safety and the avoidance of potential issues due to JavaScript's type coercion. Using explicit types instead of any helps prevent runtime errors and ensures that the code behaves as expected. While your implementation may serve the purpose of this test, in a real-world scenario, specifying explicit types for parameters would contribute to more robust and maintainable code. If the intention is to demonstrate handling of mixed types, consider implementing explicit type checks or conversions within the method to handle such cases safely.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You looks cool man Thank you I understand and I'm testing you
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Rubanrubi: Thank you for the kind words! I'm here to help with any further tests or questions you might have. Feel free to reach out anytime. 😊
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json,!**/*.jsonpackage.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (5)
- src/app/app.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/app/app.routes.ts (1 hunks)
- src/app/component/image-cropper/image-cropper.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/app/component/image-cropper/image-cropper.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/app/component/image-cropper/image-cropper.component.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/app/app.component.html
- src/app/component/image-cropper/image-cropper.component.css
Additional context used
Biome
src/app/component/image-cropper/image-cropper.component.ts
[error] 70-70: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Additional comments not posted (27)
src/app/app.routes.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM! Import statement forImageCropperComponentis correct.The import path is correct and properly utilized.
6-6: LGTM! Route configuration is correct.The route path
image-cropperis correctly associated withImageCropperComponent.src/app/component/image-cropper/image-cropper.component.html (8)
1-15: LGTM! HTML structure and elements for uploading and cropping images are correct.The HTML elements and attributes are properly used for uploading and cropping images.
16-19: LGTM! HTML structure and elements for clearing and resetting images are correct.The HTML elements and attributes are properly used for clearing and resetting images.
21-21: LGTM! Angular Cropper component usage is correct.The
angular-croppercomponent is correctly used with the appropriate attributes and event bindings.
23-27: LGTM! HTML structure and elements for rotating images are correct.The HTML elements and attributes are properly used for rotating images.
28-33: LGTM! HTML structure and elements for zooming images are correct.The HTML elements and attributes are properly used for zooming images in and out.
34-39: LGTM! HTML structure and elements for scaling images are correct.The HTML elements and attributes are properly used for scaling images horizontally and vertically.
40-43: LGTM! HTML structure and elements for moving images are correct.The HTML elements and attributes are properly used for moving images in different directions.
49-49: LGTM! Displaying cropped image is correct.The HTML element for displaying the cropped image is correctly used.
src/app/component/image-cropper/image-cropper.component.ts (17)
1-4: LGTM! Import statements are correct.The import statements for necessary Angular modules and CropperJS are correctly used.
5-12: LGTM! Component metadata is correct.The component metadata including selector, standalone, imports, schemas, templateUrl, and styleUrls are properly used.
13-14: LGTM! ViewChild for Angular Cropper component is correct.The
ViewChilddecorator for Angular Cropper component is correctly used.
16-34: LGTM! Cropper options are correctly defined.The cropper options are properly defined and initialized.
35-37: LGTM! Source image is correctly defined.The source image URL is properly defined and initialized.
39-39: LGTM! Result emitter is correctly defined.The result emitter is properly defined and initialized.
41-44: LGTM! Scale values and cropped image are correctly defined.The scale values and cropped image are properly defined and initialized.
45-51: LGTM! ngOnInit lifecycle method is correctly implemented.The
ngOnInitlifecycle method is properly defined and implemented.
81-83: LGTM! Event handler for cl is correctly implemented.The event handler for
clis properly defined and implemented.
85-92: LGTM! Event handler for crop is correctly implemented.The event handler for
cropis properly defined and implemented.
94-96: LGTM! Event handler for reset is correctly implemented.The event handler for
resetis properly defined and implemented.
98-100: LGTM! Event handler for clear is correctly implemented.The event handler for
clearis properly defined and implemented.
102-104: LGTM! Event handler for rotate is correctly implemented.The event handler for
rotateis properly defined and implemented.
106-109: LGTM! Event handler for zoom is correctly implemented.The event handler for
zoomis properly defined and implemented.
111-114: LGTM! Event handler for scaleX is correctly implemented.The event handler for
scaleXis properly defined and implemented.
116-119: LGTM! Event handler for scaleY is correctly implemented.The event handler for
scaleYis properly defined and implemented.
121-123: LGTM! Event handler for move is correctly implemented.The event handler for
moveis properly defined and implemented.
| upload($event: any): void { | ||
| console.log("TCL: ImageCropperComponent -> constructor -> event", $event); | ||
| if ($event.target.files && $event.target.files[0]) { | ||
| const reader = new FileReader(); | ||
| reader.onload = (e: any) => { | ||
| this.sourceImage = e.target.result; | ||
| }; | ||
| reader.readAsDataURL($event.target.files[0]); | ||
| this.angularCropper.cropperOptions = this.cropperOptions; | ||
| this.angularCropper.imageUrl = this.sourceImage; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use optional chaining for safer property access.
Change to an optional chain to handle cases where the target element might not exist.
- if ($event.target.files && $event.target.files[0]) {
+ if ($event.target?.files?.[0]) {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| upload($event: any): void { | |
| console.log("TCL: ImageCropperComponent -> constructor -> event", $event); | |
| if ($event.target.files && $event.target.files[0]) { | |
| const reader = new FileReader(); | |
| reader.onload = (e: any) => { | |
| this.sourceImage = e.target.result; | |
| }; | |
| reader.readAsDataURL($event.target.files[0]); | |
| this.angularCropper.cropperOptions = this.cropperOptions; | |
| this.angularCropper.imageUrl = this.sourceImage; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| upload($event: any): void { | |
| console.log("TCL: ImageCropperComponent -> constructor -> event", $event); | |
| if ($event.target?.files?.[0]) { | |
| const reader = new FileReader(); | |
| reader.onload = (e: any) => { | |
| this.sourceImage = e.target.result; | |
| }; | |
| reader.readAsDataURL($event.target.files[0]); | |
| this.angularCropper.cropperOptions = this.cropperOptions; | |
| this.angularCropper.imageUrl = this.sourceImage; | |
| } | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 70-70: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
No description provided.