Styling/coding standards

[Tirpitz93]

Which coding standards/PEP guides are you planning to adhere to.
As this is a python library aimed at python users(presumably) the PEPs would be a good place to start.

Also when implementing the classes there are a couple options regarding the OOP interface as I see it:

1. literal translations so getPos player becomes player.getPos(). or player.get_pos()
2. @property decorator to wrap the calls to the DLL to the user so that getPos player becomes player.pos , and player setPos [a,b,c] becomes player.pos = [a,b,c].
3. Both of the above, having one approach call the other for example. This illustrates both approaches, and is therefor less pythonic ("one way to do something").

     class RV_Object(object):
        def __init__(self):
           # todo
           pass

        @property
        def pos(self)->tuple:pass

        @pos.setter
        def pos(self, pos:tuple)->None:pass

        def get_pos(self)->tuple: pass # todo

        def set_pos(self, pos:tuple)->None: pass # todo

[overfl0]

Using PEP8 would be a good start ;).
I'd suggest doing as "everyone else does" and increasing the line size limit to 120 chars (with 1080p and even 4k monitors nowadays)

I'm sitting on a fence regarding the camelCase vs snake_notation. I'm used to snake but I also see the benefit of sticking to the original SQF function names. Deep inside me I'd prefer to stick with the original naming (less confusion) but I haven't done enough Arma modding (nor even used Intercept much) to speak authoritatively about this matter.

[Tirpitz93]

Where do you guys stand on replacing get_* and set_* with a property?
If necessary adding aliases to the property.
Also what would the preferred naming convention/ namespace for the class names be?
RV_*
Intercept_*
Arma_*

[Tirpitz93]

I have some boilerplate code here: https://github.com/Tirpitz93/intercept-python/tree/python_classes.

[jonpas]

Intercept uses snake_case for all SQF wrappers as well, might as well do the same here.